Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasah Montessori Center for Learning Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doesn't even pass the WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES test. ansh 666 05:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nasah Montessori Center for Learning Inc.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school with nothing more than routine coverage (directory-style listings, etc.). Edgeweyes (talk) 12:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment: previously, all schools were presumed to be notable, I don't know whether this was an explicit policy or guideline but WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES was often cited. I believe this has now been overridden by an RfC which took place when I was on a wikibreak but I'm not sure. Could a clued-up user tell me whether this is the case please? DrStrauss talk 14:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It has never been the case that all schools have been considered notable. For the last 8 years or so, essentially all secondary schools with a demonstrable real physical existence have in practice been determined at AfD to be notable (a recent AfD said both that there was no consensus to merely refer to CommonOutcomes but also no consensus to change the practice of considering them notable). For the same 8 years, no primary or intermediate school of tutoring academy has been considered notable at AfD unless there were clear specific factors of notability, and very few such schools have been found to eet them.

It is my understanding that Montessori schools are usually primary or primary-intermediate, though secondary Montessori schools do exist. There is no information in this article to give the nature of this school--and there are no references to show real existence. Their web site [1] and [2] says they have high school classes, but the only evidence of this is a photo on the site of what appear to be high school students. However, I can find no sources whatsoever for the school besides their own website and social media pages, and inclusion on several list of schools. The question here is, what are our standards for real existence. DGG ( talk ) 18:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough evidence to justify treating it as a functioning high school.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.