Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narrow House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Narrow House[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable publishing company. Speedied it but it was declined on the basis of inherited notability (they're notable because they publish people who do have articles).

There were two articles, one at Narrow House and one at Narrow house. I tagged both for speedy, the House article was deleted forthwith (by some other admin) and the house article was moved to House by the admin who declined to delete it. Dethroned Buoy (talk) 15:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Publishing works by notable authors doesn't make a company inherently notable. Whoever declined the speedy is out of their sodding mind for thinking that such a thing as "inherent notability" exists. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:17, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no external sources proving notability, Sadads (talk) 01:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.