Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narongrit Waraporn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily deleted by DGG as G11. (WP:NAC). Mark Arsten (talk) 00:31, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Narongrit Waraporn[edit]
- Narongrit Waraporn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to pass Wikipedia's notability criteria. Paul_012 (talk) 09:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is a (rather poor) CV and shows nothing to suggest notability. Emeraude (talk) 13:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 14:41, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I couldn't find any notability elements for PROF in article. Also, google scholar shows citations of 5, 4, 2, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, which is too low. In addition, no newspaper or magazine mention from a google search... Tradedia (talk) 14:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - complete spam - WP:Wikipedia is not the place to post your resume. Seeming as I've already deleted it once, I'll leave it to another admin to check over. SmartSE (talk) 16:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.