Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narjis daughter of Yeshua

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Narjis. (non-admin closure) Dps04 (talk) 18:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Narjis daughter of Yeshua[edit]

Narjis daughter of Yeshua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unsourced article. It makes a claim that her grandfather was the "king of Rome", I think this might mean the head of the SUltanate of Rum, which was in what is today Turkey, but I am not sure. It lakes sources, and is written in a clearly unencyclopedic style. My search for sources just showed up a bunch of Wikipedia mirrors, which shows we really need to stop allowing random creation of articles and start forcing all articles through the Articles for Creation process John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as completely unsourced. Since this article is apparently about a Christian woman who converted to Islam and is written from a Muslim perspective, the claim that her grandfather was "king of Rome" may mean that he was the emperor of the Byzantine Empire, which was traditionally referred to as Rome in Arabic, and for that matter was called the Roman Empire by its own Greek-speaking inhabitants in that era. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.