Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naresh Bhattarai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Naresh Bhattarai[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating Naresh Bhattarai for AFD Because the subject does not have enough online presence. And Most of the reference links attached are Youtube videos, Which any person can make and upload from different Youtube channels. Tatupiplu (talk) 14:38, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 January 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as there are plenty of reliable sources linked in the external links section such as this here from a news source, and some of the YouTube links are valid as they are the official videos of tv talkshows he has featured on,imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:07, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete: There are 20 total reference links added to the article, out of which 18 references are of Youtube, and most of the videos are deleted. The citations are for the youtube music videos from unreliable youtube channels. There are no citations found on the web for the information claimed in the article. And there is only one media link mentioning him. But overall, this person fails to meet our notability creteria WP:N - WP:RELY Tatupiplu'^talk—Preceding undated comment added 10:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The nomination counts as your delete vote, Atlantic306 (talk) 17:02, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 22:58, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Subject seems to be notable by videos. GargAvinash (talk) 04:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.