Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naqshbandia Mujaddidia Najmiya Riyaziya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naqshbandia Mujaddidia Najmiya Riyaziya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Lacks reliable sources; only source provided is dead link. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:23, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete, the source is reliable, the link is not dead the only thing is that every one of wikipedia admin users cant understand urdu. As a part of wikipedia user I assure you I have visited the place and have searched & verified all the details. Rest is up to you guys — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aasim001 (talkcontribs) 09:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:59, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Riyaz Ahmad Naqshbandi i cant post the whole spiritual lineage that's why i need a separate page for it. any decision which is made would be appreciated. User talk:Aasim001 05:00, 07 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The "complete" list has two additional persons, Syed Amin Ahmad Hasnaini Mujadaddi and Syed Sarim Riyaz Hasnaini Mujadaddi, who do not appear in the presented sources. Only 37 individuals are mentioned on pages 25-29 of http://www.ghuncha-e-marfat.org/stn.html, with Syed Riyaz Ahmad Naqshbandi Mujadaddi being the final one. In other words, the "complete" list is original research and should be deleted. --HyperGaruda (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  11:44, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. It should be on the wikipedia like other golden naqshbandi chain, the book cant be reprinted with the updated names day by day but you can find all the mention names on http://www.ghuncha-e-marfat.org/mm.html (its has got all the names till now). we all are working for wikipedia foundation to make it a place for true & accurate information. Thanks User talk:Aasim001 06:, 49 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete This is one of the clearest cases I've seen in a while. There's only a single, questionable source for a list of names, most of which refer to people without articles of their own. This is a major fail of WP:GNG and there isn't even enough in the article or basic subject for the discussion to move beyond that. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete now i vote for to delete this page at the earliest. User talk:Aasim001 07:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.