Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Smith (campaigner)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Best for Britain. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Naomi Smith (campaigner)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Naomi Smith (campaigner) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's a fair amount of trivial and primary coverage of the subject, but I can't find any coverage that actually attempts to paint a biographical portrait or otherwise actually analyzes her life or work. I don't think that she meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOLITICIAN at the moment, and would suggest redirecting to Best for Britain, the context that a majority of the currently cited sources refer to her in. A separate issue that I'm realizing now is that this isn't a great disambiguator; if kept or redirected the page should probably be retitled Naomi Smith (politician). _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Delete or at best redirect to Best for Britain. Subject fails WP:NPOL/. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
• Agree with redirect. Lack of secondary independent sourcing indicates the subject fails NPOL.

Also, change title as recommended to Naomi Smith (politician). ---Steve Quinn (talk) 08:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

• Redirect to Best for Britain. This is Paul (talk) 17:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.