Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nano Research Laboratory Tehran (Ultrasonic Research Lab)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:06, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nano Research Laboratory Tehran (Ultrasonic Research Lab)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable lab. lacks in depth coverage. Tame (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Google search and Google News bring up nothing, Google Books brings up two results that upon further inspection have nothing to do with the topic of the article, and the two "sources" that this article cites are very clearly primary. Unless someone can find some offline secondary sources about this topic, this seems to be a pretty clear fail of WP:GNG. Duckmather (talk) 17:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For analysis of the content added less than 24 hours ago.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:33, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep & Don't delete Ultrasonic Research Laboratory of Tehran is part of International Federation of Inventors' Associations. They obtain IFIA certificate and their innovation was granted with IFIA Innovation Standard Grade A. This lab was introduced by multiple online references like IFIA, Delwaco.ir, Delwaco.com and Ultrasonic Lab. As you can see, I'm constantly updating this article. However, there are also much more subjects like certificates (ISO / IEC 17025 standard certificate, Certificate of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and Certificate from the World Food Safety Organization), innovations(Saffron Nanoemulsion), scientific articles (Employing Nanoemulsions in Food Packaging) to be covered. The article definitely deserves to be updated and kept on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radvino (talk • contribs)
Delete Fails WP:NORG, likely WP:COI. XOR'easter (talk) 21:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Don't delete The content of the page has been improved from the beginning. It is worth updating and keeping the page available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahimian r (talk • contribs) 10:16, 28 February 2022 (UTC) — Rahimian r (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete Just a support lab at a University with no apparent profile beyond. Just achieving a certification does not demonstrate notability, and the other refs, not based on the certification documentation, are either peripheral (not about the lab) or non-independent. No expectation there is better sourcing out there to be found. Agricolae (talk) 14:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is being standardized which means it shouldn't be nominated for deletion. Just give them a break! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JinWidmore 85 (talk • contribs) 11:26, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JinWidmore 85: New comments go at the bottom of the page, not the top. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Mostly due to failing WP:NORG, but nothing really standing out from the academic side either. As others have said, it looks like a WP:COI issue with multiple new editors showing up. I'm only seeing non-independent sources, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, or basically puffery type sources involved here. I don't see this as a useful redirect either for search terms, much less a merge, so delete in this case. KoA (talk) 00:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.