Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nano Ganesh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Due to low participation and inability for soft deletion. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 17:12, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nano Ganesh[edit]

Nano Ganesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a mobile application operated water pump system. It has won few awards. I think it is not some major breakthrough technology or revolutionary device. Article looks more like an advertisement than about technology/device itself. The awards and accolades are generic innovation listings and praises. I can not find how this device/application is notable. There is media coverage few years ago but no sustained coverage. The company website itself is not updated since 2015. I doubt that if device is still sold or not. Anyway I think it is generic product. Nizil (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nizil (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Nizil (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nizil (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 08:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.