Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Zettler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Zettler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. WP:BLP, written even more blatantly like a campaign brochure or a LinkedIn résumé than usual, of a person notable only as an as-yet-unelected candidate in a pending election. As always, candidates do not pass WP:NPOL just for being candidates; if you cannot properly demonstrate and source that she was already eligible for an article for some other reason before becoming a candidate, then she does get a standalone article until she wins the election. And this article is not based on reliable sources either, but is referenced entirely to all-candidate directories (Ballotpedia, VoteSmart) and blogs. This is not the kind of sourcing that it takes to make a candidate for office notable just for being a candidate. Bearcat (talk) 20:33, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No significant coverage found Clarityfiend (talk) 00:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Seems no different than most WP:POLOUTCOMES: Does not meet WP:GNG ("significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article") or WP:BIO. No sources presented but a couple blogs and a couple non-RS sites where every candidate get an entry. (Same article creator User:Michael Powerhouse as in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Parkhurst, where the comments speak for themselves.) --Closeapple (talk) 06:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another not as yet notable candidiate for office in Illinois.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.