Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Shakir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:15, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Shakir[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed congressional candidate, search doesn't show she's received sufficient coverage to meet GNG or any relevant SNG Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NPOL, unsuccesful candidates are rarely considered notable. Much less one that didn't even make it past the primaries.--🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 18:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:21, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being unsuccessful candidates in elections, but this neither demonstrates that she had preexisting notability for other reasons independent of her candidacy nor evinces a reason to deem her candidacy as unusually notable in comparison to most other candidacies. Bearcat (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 13:01, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.