Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Nancy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 03:50, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nancy Nancy[edit]
- Nancy Nancy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
And also this one fails WP:GNG. The director's own article was recently deleted, btw. SarahStierch (talk) 16:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete per TOO SOON. The film exists, but fails WP:NF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:29, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG Flat Out let's discuss it 02:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. If I may be frank, this doesn't have a snowball's chance of surviving. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:08, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No coverage. SL93 (talk) 23:44, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.