Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Howes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Howes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person has not attracted sufficient in-depth coverage in reliable sources to meet the notability requirements of WP:BIO. SmartSE (talk) 20:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:52, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:52, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, tentatively. The article is somewhat promotional and should be tagged and/or edited for that. It should be considered to be a combo article about Nancy Howes and about KnowYourself.com company, and it should be edited to more explicitly cover the company. I am not too confident in my expertise in AFDs about persons and businesses, but doesn't Parent's Choice award/recognition for a product coulnt as something significant? --do ncr am 23:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Doncram: We need several independent references which discuss her in depth for there to be an article about her. That award doesn't count for anything - are you suggesting that we should have an article about every business-owner whose products have received it? SmartSE (talk) 09:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete an overly promotional article with no clear indicaitions of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:38, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO .Her awards are not notable neither is her company and notability is not inherited based on her husband Tim Howes. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:16, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - Written as if it is her résumé.Acnetj (talk) 04:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Additionally, written by SPA whose only substantial edit was creating this page. Agricola44 (talk) 17:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete this is an awful promotional article that amounts to a professional bio. The sources are of similar quality. Accordingly, the notability requirements (for distributed in-depth sources in reliable publications) is not met.96.127.242.251 (talk) 02:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly of no value to the encyclopedia and not notable. Dysklyver 15:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.