Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nana to Kaoru (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 11:22, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nana to Kaoru[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Search for third party sources only comes up with a couple of trivial mentions related to changes in a manga magazine. No significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources found to pass WP:BK. OVA and live action adaptations have also received no coverage beyond the original announcement. —Farix (t | c) 01:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 01:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although it pains me to say so, I have to agree with Farix here. There is insufficient third-party coverage for this series to warrant an entry in Wikipedia at the moment. That situation may change with time. Don't be put off reading Nana to Kaoru though... it's actually a rather good story. David Bailey (talk) 10:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. The last AFD ended in delete, but someone forgot to delete it. Check the history of the article [1] and it shows the entire history is there. Did it get deleted? Some sort of bug? Did an administrator undelete it? Dream Focus 03:39, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was missed. The decision to delete was made on 18 August 2010, but wasn't actioned. Xezbeth (an admin) removed the {AfDM} template on 28 Oct 2010 and then continued to edit it. David Bailey (talk) 11:17, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.