Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakayama Naotaka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nakayama Naotaka

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN acupuncturist, fails the GNG. Beyond numerous Wiki mirrors of this article, I could find ZERO sources discussing the subject, reliable or otherwise, substantial or namedrops. No evidence that the awards claimed in the article were actually awarded. Suspicion that misleading information was included; a medical journal was cited for issues in 1970 and 1974 when Elsevier states that Volume 1, Issue 1 was in 1979. Notability tagged for over a decade. Created by a SPA with no other Wikipedia activity. Ravenswing 15:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 15:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 15:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I googled "中山直隆" and couldnt find much. Searching あはぎ法制定４０周年 returned nothing either.--RZuo (talk) 09:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Flori4nK ^{t • c} 16:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lacking notable enough sourcing for a while now, being created by a SPA, and the fact that nothing about the person can be find. So, this seems like a pretty clear cut delete case to me. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:43, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.