Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Najib Kilani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Najib Kilani[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DEPRODed because of allegedly several awards received, fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BEFORE gave me only catalog entries of some of his books, no prove of any award received nor reviews of his works. The 2 sources are CAT Entries of his books, 1 source is unrelated. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sun8908 _Talk 11:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No comment for article. But the author seems notable to me. 2000+ worldcat librray holding. Several non-English full-length critical works exist about his work. --Gazal world (talk) 18:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep There are claims of notability in the article and the same in this other language article My search returned several hits. While the article does need improved references, I think they are available. Jeepday (talk) 18:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 11:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Published literary study in his work here, profiled in Al Jazeera here, researchgate paper comparing his work with other writers here as well as plenty of other sources in Arabic I’m not up to ploughing through. Mccapra (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on the existence of multiple independent reliable sources. And I would like to remind editors that while English language sources are preferred, they are not required. Being an English-language Wikipedia means only that we write articles in English, not that we are limited to English language subjects or sources. Hyperion35 (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.