Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Najeh-gram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 02:17, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Najeh-gram[edit]

hoax, 0 googles RJFJR 02:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as haox --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 02:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoax/neologism Gwernol 02:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete as hoax. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 03:01, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism (or, in any case, surely not in our vernacular), although it should be said that, whilst this usage is probably a hoax, the Najeh Davenport story is, for Packers fans, all too real. Joe 04:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 04:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. Hbackman 05:31, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom ~Linuxerist L / T 07:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 07:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dicdef/neologism at best. --Icarus 08:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does this article entertain or inform? Nope. Lankiveil 11:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, neologism, probably hoax. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 11:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neologism. --Ter e nc e Ong 12:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Nigelthefish 14:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.