Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagambie Football Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep interesting to note the nominator wanted to keep. Gnan garra 11:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nagambie Football Club

Team notability per WP:ORG. Oo7565 09:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

keep yes i know i added this but i was doing it for someone else for senies the prod was contested this team was won many titles week reason i feel sorry for even being it here darn staying up too late sorryOo7565 09:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No secondary sources cited, but no less notable than any of the other teams in the Kyabram & District Football League which also have Wikipedia entries. Deleting this one implies all the others should be slated for AfD. I realise that per the rules of AfD, notability has not been independently established here. But I think this is a case for ignoring the rule (and not making AfD nominations when you're tired and not thinking straight...) Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 11:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I removed the PROD tag from all the KDFL teams earlier as I thought they should be brought to AfD. I propose that these articles should be kept as per a draft guideline/essay that can be found here - User:Mattinbgn/Sandbox - Notability Australian football leagues and clubs. In short, while the clubs are not notable for the standard of play, they are notable for the social and cultural impact they have had in the towns and surrounding regions. Country football in Victoria at least is reasonably well documented and sources to create a decent article should be able to be found. If the consensus is that the article should be deleted, the content should be merged to Kyabram & District Football League. Other football leagues in Victoria that may bear some revelance to this discussion include Murray Football League, Picola & District Football League and Riddell District Football League and their constituent clubs. -- Mattinbgn/^talk 22:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment what's at Diggers Rest Football Club other than templates, a link to the town, and a link to the league? Nothing, merge it to Riddell District Football League which is tiny anyway.Garrie 22:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment I guess the short answer is the information in the template such as strip, home ground, etc. Granted, the article is small but that is why it is tagged as a stub and could be expanded rather than deleted. -- Mattinbgn/^talk 22:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete every article on {{Kyabram & District Football League}}. None meet WP:CORP or WP:N individually. Most of the material is a list of premiership wins, which would be better at Kyabram & District Football League where it is already listed.Ga rr ie 22:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Premierships by this football club between 1897 and 1937 (unknown league(s)), the premiership with Waranga North East Football Association in 1938 and the 3 premierships with Goulburn Valley Football League in 1939, 1946, 1947 are not listed at Kyabram & District Football League. The existence and composition of leagues varies over time, but football clubs such as this have longer and separate historys - 110 years in this case.--Melburnian 02:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into an article on the league, and do the same with the rest of the teams in this league. The league itself is probably notable, especially given the longevity of some of the clubs involved. But the individual teams themselves... probably not. Lankiveil 10:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.