Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naga Chaitanya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naga Chaitanya

Most of the article argues about how notable the subject is due to his relatives; problem is notability is not inheritable. Also his own accomplishments are not quite there yet - an appearance in a movie that is still filming. Tabercil (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep: Article can be linked to by 4 other articles. Familial ties are considered much more important in some countries than others. Notability has been asserted, and reliable sources exist. There seems to be nothing offensive, self-promoting, or irrelevant about the information. Although Wikipedia is not a crystal ball WP:CRYSTAL, there seems to be no reason we can't stay a little bit ahead of the curve on a good bet (especially one formatted so nicely and reffed so cleanly... it would be a shame to have to recreate it in a few months when the movie is released). If the film is canceled, it wouldn't be a problem to re-nominate it. Would the nominator consider instead a refimprove template, or a future events template, in the spirit of inclusionism? Cheers. --OliverTwisted ^(Talk)(Stuff) 04:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 04:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 05:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "He made his film debut in ... which is still under production" Not yet notable, no matter who his parents are. DGG (talk) 05:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the content need be lost as it can be userfied. But notability is not established yet. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, his debut created waves in the Telugu film industry. More links will be added.Universal Hero (talk) 12:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being related to notable people does not make you notable. His single film has not even been released yet. Edward321 (talk) 14:24, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice. The man is getting news coverage, but all in relationship to Josh, a film currently under production. When it is released, and he gets some individual attention, let it come back. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.