Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nache

Together goes half a dozen other articles, whose fate is to be decided by this vote. (Paulina Nowicka, Wokalistka grupy Nache Natalia, To Co W Życiu Najważniejsze,Dziewczyny,Zabierz Mnie Ze Sobą,Nache (album))

I would also ask pop music experts to thoroughly verify other contributions of 84.40.192.143 (talk · contribs), who was the author. E.g. I see he tried to add (mis)info into Emma Bunton (at least I see all his "contributions" have been removed). mikka (t) 20:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Del: verifiability problem. Either an elaborate hoax or most shameless promo I've seen. Some artcles of the "Nache" series claim enormous notability, including BMG records; eg., one article says "Album have sell 700.000 copies", Nache album - "six times platinum" - it should be quite notable in Poland, then. mikka (t) 20:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE: as per nom -- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 20:47, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE - obviously this article is a joke somebody is playing. There is no word spelled nache in Polish. All the related articles linked to this one must be deleted as well. Hard to believe this article managed to stay up for half a year. Balcer 21:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If this was as good of a band as they said it was, I would see something about "Nache" in the Polish wikipedia. hoax....--Adam ^(talk) 21:16, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. *drew 22:03, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I investigated this myself as much as I could and felt it was a hoax. I then called in Winston.PL and Mikkalai, both of whom speak Polish and they independently confirmed my belief it was a hoax. As such, it could be speedied. But, give the age of the articles and the number of them, I thought it better to bring it to AfD. --Durin 22:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious hoax. The sooner this stuff gets deleted the better. I suppose even Molobo should agree with me on this. ;) Speedy delete,--Thorsten1 22:54, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately WP:CSD specifically excludes hoaxes. Besides, no reason to rush. They sat here for half a year. All possible harm has already been done. mikka (t) 22:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- On the other hand, a template:hoax must have ben placed on them on the first suspicion. (Now it would be meaningless anyway) mikka (t) 23:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my, Thorsten, I told you we would agree on something one day! Speedy delete BTW I googled it on Polish google, and no, they definitely don't exist.--SylwiaS | talk 23:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, advert/hoax. incog 18:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.