Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naanol Tesfaye (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G5). There also was an emerging consensus that despite the edits since the last deletion discussion the notability concerns had not been overcome. Huon (talk) 14:42, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Naanol Tesfaye[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred and Avaay: See here. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:35, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As before fails WP:NFOOTY. Maybe in future but we are not WP:CRYSTALBALL. NZFC^(talk) 06:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NFOOTY. I looked into making an argument he might pass WP:GNG based on the articles cited, but all they are and all that comes up are a bunch of routine articles a couple teams may be interested in signing him in Swedish and English. Delete without prejudice. We are a few years WP:TOOSOON to draftify. SportingFlyer talk 06:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Still fails WP:NFOOTY and still fails WP:GNG. All sources (apart from the ebc.et video, which I don't understand) stem from a post on self-publishing site o-posts.com, either citing/referring to that site directly or citing/referring to one earlier in the chain. And what that original source says, is that "Two weeks after he was enlisted into the Football-Wonderkids database, O-Posts can now reveal that Naanol ”Naani” Tesfaye is being closely followed by Manchester City and Leeds United along with other top European sides" and that he might play for the Ethiopian under-17 team. The Football-Wonderkids database claims to "help players get scouted and raise their profile". Delete. Struway2 (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - That dose not matter and is irrelevant mate, per WP:GNG he has been noted in magazines and newspapers with no regards to this so called o-post nor football-wonderkids website, therefor you're not correct pal, please seek to see my answer to seek a different vote per my comment.

Keep - Per WP:GNG he is overally very suited for a note. Please view notability for footballers where a sportsperson(soccer) is per WP:GNG suited for a note regard less of WP:NFOOTY, through GNG the subject in this case mr Tesfaye has been in exclusive first page news-magazines including Sweden-top-news magazine Norran and also Karlstad magazine in Sweden including transfer notice in Aftonbladet which is Swedens biggest newssource(TT), not only this but in Ethiopia has been viewd within radio where subject did an exclusive full-on interview that was broacasted in national tv known as EBC TV and re-aired in many TV channels of Ethiopia. He is clearly through WP:GNG accepted where he has an entire first page article of him in the newspaper which I have a picture of if you guys want it to view and verify. Via this he also has been admired by many viewing his notability for say when the Ethiopian Football Federation said that He is the future star, per this he not only has significant coverage but also expells a famous standard. He has been called up and contacted for the U17 which refeers to the U19 in his radio talk show and it only takes GNG for a player to become noted therefor it is a violation to vote no when in decion of not opinion. It's a clear keep and I excpet per this inofrmaition that you change your opnion of delete to Keep. This answer/opinion was requested by @Struway2, my best / Avaay (talk)

For clarification: What I "requested", in response to Avaay's lengthy text on my talk page encouraging me to change my vote, was that if they had evidence of Mr Tesfaye passing GNG, they should supply it at the AfD. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, if picture is wanted of magazines I can provide a couple of images I have found and etained from fellow to verify he is very well accepted via WP:GNG... Avaay

All you need to do is cite the sources, eg. as below. Prince of Thieves (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

<Name of magazine>, <date>, <page number>, <headline of article>, <optional description>.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.