Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NZWF

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NZWF[edit]

NZWF (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organisation. No independent refs. Nothing obvious in google. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 03:54, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 03:54, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 03:54, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- I'm unable to find anything that would help this organisation meet WP:GNG. Will change my vote if others find some though. Doesn't help that this article is very much written in a promotional tone. Even if kept, will need a rewrite to be encyclopedic. -- Shudde talk 08:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.