Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NOLAP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NOLAP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The entire article is original research. Aside from a link to a small startup [1], Google returns no relevant results. None of the sources used in the article talk or event mention the term McSly (talk) 18:05, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand how to add comments to discuss why this article should not be deleted. Is this correct, add edits to this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlesHoffman (talk • contribs) 13:50, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is mostly WP:OR. There is very little in the way of secondary and primary sources to support the article. Even your website article posts back to this WP article page, with only 3 other Google page hits supporting both this term and the concept, also linking to this page. In addition to that, the article also advances a narrow field, specific to certain financial reporting products. It also focuses on XBRL. Why? There is many more reasons. I hope it doesn't put you off. scope_creep talk 18:48 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete. I can't find any evidence that this neologism represents a notable framework or class of OLAP systems, much less a "global standard", and conversation with the article creator on this discussion's talk page confirms the impression that the article is indeed original research. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.