Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NO$GBA (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 21:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NO$GBA[edit]

NO$GBA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on this emulator fails WP:GNG with a dearth of sources. There are a couple of mentions in gaming news sites, but they are relatively minor and don't fill the sustained, significant coverage criteria. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 16:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the rationales in the second AFD discussion in the past, which was valid and ended in delete. The first one is from 2007, when the standards were much more lax. The sourcing provided in that discussion would definitely not meet our current WP:RS or WP:GNG standards. Sergecross73 msg me 16:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - None of the sources mentioned in previous AFDs pass WP:RS, as Sergecross73 mentioned above. When trying to find reliable sources of my own, I came up completely empty-handed. FlotillaFlotsam (talk) 23:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.