Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NNDN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NNDN[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Only self-published content available; fails WP:COMPOSER and WP:GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:33, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, India, and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:34, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The creator, additionally, tried to strip the deletion template from the article, with the result that I independently came across it and initiated a redundant second AFD discussion on it for the exact same reasons. So I've already closed that, and am copy-pasting my own deletion rationale here: semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a musician, not properly referenced as passing WP:NMUSIC. As always, every musician is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because he exists, and has to be shown to pass certain specific markers of noteworthy achievement supported by a certain specific class of reliable source coverage about him in media -- but this isn't claiming anything that would pass the criteria in NMUSIC, and is referenced entirely to his music's presence on online streaming platforms, and a simple list of the results of a Google search, rather than any evidence of media coverage about him. And even if I switch the Google search to the "news" tab, I only get news articles about monthly COVID-19 statistics in Rhode Island and an article about a Ukrainian child who went missing in Poland, not any coverage of an Indian musician.
Additionally, this is almost certainly an WP:AUTOBIO, as the subject's real name matches closely to the creator's username.
As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations site on which emerging musicians are entitled to have articles for the publicity -- but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be a subject of WP:GNG-worthy coverage in real media. And, of course, the page will have to be monitored for any future attempts to remove the deletion template prematurely. Bearcat (talk) 17:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:COMPOSER and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, obviously fails notability. Silikonz💬 21:54, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree with nom. My searched lead me to conclude he is not notable. CT55555(talk) 01:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable whatsoever. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 02:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the above comments; fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPOSER. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:46, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per G5, it seems to me that this article is created by a blocked user (known as Nandanvinayan2555). 213.107.49.184 (talk) 15:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination and in the above comments. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:V, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:SNOW, and WP:SALT. Sourcing that is so bad that it might as well be unverifiable. In 2023, everyone knows that we are not a social media site or web host. The consensus is clear and unlikely to change. Based on the clear and convincing evidence that a banned sock-puppet wrote essentially the entire article, it should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearian (talk • contribs) 19:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.