Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NMODEM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to XMODEM#NMODEM. ✗plicit 09:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NMODEM[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No references Imcdc (talk) 04:28, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 04:28, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to XMODEM#NMODEM where it is briefly discussed. The protocol doesn't seem to independently notable from XMODEM, but basic facts are verifiable and it is a plausible search term. Redirect to an already existing section that has some sourcing seems warranted. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 20:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect; my searches failed to come up with any useful literature regarding this protocol in its own right, but it seems to warrant a mention in XMODEM. jp×g 20:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.