Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NK Trogir 1912

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 05:18, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NK Trogir 1912[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This lower tier football club has been founded in 2009 and is billed as continuation of the defunct HNK Trogir, but would not inherit any notability nor seems to have some on its own. Tikiwont (talk) 13:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I tried googling some info. This webpage which isn't the newest suggests the other club isn't quite dead, or is that a page of NK Trogir 1902? -Koppapa (talk) 13:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:08, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG, no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 10:08, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge / Redirect - Probably merits a line or two in the HNK Trogir page if they are shown to be linked clubs. If not, then Delete as non-notable per GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:01, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 00:10, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom in the absence of useful facts about this club. No indication it is linked to the HNK Trogir organisation, so merge would not be appropriate. No indication the club is notable. C 679 19:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to HNK Trogir - does not pass the general notability guideline for stand-alone articles, but should be mentioned at the other clubs article. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On what basis would you redirect, if a link between the clubs is not confirmed? C 679 05:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This club clearly fails the general notability guideline. No prejudice to redirecting to HNK Trogir if a connection between the two clubs can be reliably sourced. However, at present, there is no indication beyond the text of the article that such a connection exists. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:49, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.