Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGOism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 06:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Okay, you folks outside the obscure partisan fights of Europe's backwater, have you ever heard of this? Low hundreds in Google, seems decidedly sub-noteworthy vanity propaganda to me. --Malyctenar 13:30, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, it is political propaganda made by Lumidek. But as the Czech version shows, it could be modified according NPOV and then be useful for readers. If we have the Czech version, why not English? --Egg ✉ 13:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 17:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Agree with Malyctenar and Thesquire. Dear colleague Egg, even if Lumidek loves Klaus – as quite some of our Czech country women and men do, as he gives them what they like to hear – and puts his love as far as en.wikipedia, we should help our colleagues over here to fight vanity and, in this case, meaningless Klaus' neologisms. (Another thing is that of a very low threshold for vanity at cs.wiki... and yet another of watching out for propaganda on en.wiki...) wiki-vr 07:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, after reading WP:NEO I vote delete. --Egg ✉ 08:16, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable, unverifiable neologism i.e. protologism. Stifle 20:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.