Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGC 544

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of NGC objects (1–1000)#544. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 05:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NGC 544

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although this meets one of the WP:NASTCRIT criteria, it fails WP:GNG. No popular coverage, no professional coverage outside of widescale surveys and databases. Lithopsian (talk) 19:26, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Thebiv19 (talk) 19:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of NGC objects (1–1000). With 7,000+ catalogued astronomical objects, there is no presumed notability for them. Needs specific coverage, not just databases. Reywas92^Talk 20:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:13, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because that part of NASTRO is kind of defunct anyway. It's silly to say that all NGC objects are notable. I would support the redirect as well. In the future all non-notable NGC objects should be redirected to their respective lists. Sam-2727 (talk) 02:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.