Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NESCafe
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Philippe 04:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- NESCafe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod (which was actually placed inappropriately). Article has been tagged since May 2007 for sourcing and cleanup. Article does not have reliable sources which assert notability of the subject. A similar article describing vNES has been deleted for similar rationales. That is not a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument but a suggestion that editors may find persuasive argument for or against the deletion there. Protonk (talk) 02:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Protonk (talk) 02:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —Protonk (talk) 02:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. Protonk (talk) 03:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While a Google Search indicated the topic is listed on alot of emulator websites, and well used, having it listed on the List of NES emulators page would appear to be the appropriate level of inclusion. I wasn't able to find any reliable sources to establish notability as noted in the nom. Icemotoboy (talk) 03:51, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it is already listed in the List of NES emulators. Otherwise, it lacks notability. MuZemike (talk) 08:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect to List of NES emulators per WP:N --Numyht (talk) 17:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.