Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NAMTA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I'm making this a straight Delete due to sockpuppet activity on this page title. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NAMTA[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an organization, not properly sourced as passing WP:NORG. As always, organizations are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH on the quality of third-party coverage that has been devoted to their work in media and books -- but two of the four footnotes here are the organization's own self-published content about itself and a third is an unreliable source, none of which are support for notability at all, and the only citation to a reliable or GNG-worthy media outlet is not to coverage about the organization, but tangential coverage about an event that completely fails to mention this organization as having had anything whatsoever to do with it, so it doesn't support the notability of this organization either.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this group from having to be the subject of any external coverage. Bearcat (talk) 15:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, India, and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 15:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Manipur and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note:This article is currently added in the https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_enforcement_log/2023&diff=prev&oldid=1169509291 for being written/added/expanded by multiple socks. --Haoreima (talk) 16:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

delete: Not notable at all. --Haoreima (talk) 16:39, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the page history, I saw that before the page was created, there was a redirect to the commonly used acronym for an article called International Art Materials Trade Association. I suggest restoring that redirect. HarukaAmaranth (話) 02:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have no objection to the restoration of the redirect but to avoid "possible" copy and paste of the previously removed materials of this very topic (which is currently under AFD) and recreation of anything like such again by anyone, I think it will be nice if this page is deleted and again recreated for the very redirect to International Art Materials Trade Association. Haoreima (talk) 09:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.