Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NAMF
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete . --lifebaka (talk - contribs) 21:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- NAMF (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A non-notable organization, no references in the article and no independent coverage that I could find on the web. A plain google search returns only two hits, one of which is the Wikipedia article:[1]. Fails WP:ORG. Note, when google-searching, that the acronym "NAMF" is also used by a number of other organizations. Nsk92 (talk) 23:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Seems like real local organization that falls a bit below notability. LotLE×talk 23:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 00:06, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. -- —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 00:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacking notability. Tigertron (talk) 03:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)!vote from banned user struck The Evil Spartan (talk) 18:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Delete - non notable. --Peter Andersen (talk) 18:16, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.