Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N9NE Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

N9NE Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another promotional article related to other AfDs hereabouts that doesn't do much to establish notability. The sources are deadlinks, irrelevant or read like corporate press releases. EyeSerene^talk 16:24, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:COMPANY.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:43, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The references seem to be adequate. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly the number of hits on google news shows that the company meets and exceeds the expectations of WP:COMPANY. A link becoming dead after being used does not change notability. If you check, you will see that it is a common, albeit regrettable, practice for many news organizations to change the location of their online articles after a period of time. This really is a notable company and I fail to see how the facts and sources support any other conclusion. If for some weird reason this is deleted, then a stub on N9NE Steakhouse will need to be created since that alone is notable. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 20:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep firm that operated major resort facilities. Meets the requirements for notability.Dead lkinks sdo not erase notability , and a company becoming less important does not affect its past notability . We're an encyclopedia, not a directory of the currently notable only. DGG ( talk ) 03:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eastmain. Moogwrench (talk) 06:51, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Deadlinks to Dallasnews articles have been fixed. Sources are sufficient for WP:COMPANY. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 14:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.