Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N4 Garage Open Racing Series (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete (note that there does not appear to have been a first nomination Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

N4 Garage Open Racing Series[edit]

This article is not suitable for an encyclopedia. it is about a small online multiplayer league (the racing-game equivalent of a clan or guild) for the particular game, and isn't notable.

Delete Article has no quality, or importance. DeadmanUndertaker 19:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. It's an article about a small group of people participating in a home-made tournament for a video game. It doesn't get any less notable than that. -- Atama ^chat 05:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As far as I can see this article completely fails WP:Note. Natcong (talk) 14:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThis is notable because it is ti my knoeledge the only N4 Series still in existance and also one of the few places where N4 support is availibe. N4GORS has about 50 drivers T18 (talk) 22:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)T18[reply]

Comment Notability isn't inherited, furthermore, 50 users is hardly large enough to warrant even a mention in the N4 article. "It is the only _____" does not equate to notability, see WP:N. ZappyGun (talk to me)What I've done for Wikipedia 16:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

comment Maybe we could merge this with the N4 page?T18 (talk) 22:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply It is already mentioned on that page in the Online section. You can attempt to expand that section to have more information about your organization, but be careful not to put too information to give the subject undue weight within the article, and try not to be too spammy about it. I'm just giving those cautions because your edits are likely to be reverted if people see the information as just an attempt to promote N4GORS and not an attempt to expand on the N4 article itself. -- Atama ^chat 23:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.