Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N441 – Steam Locomotive Project
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 03:10, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- N441 – Steam Locomotive Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Referenced entirely by primary sources, one of which is now a dead link. No evidence of notability from reliable, third party sources. Fails the Google test. Ferroequinologly (talk) 02:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Interesting article, but completely non-notable. In addition to Google, I checked HighBeam, Questia and NewsBank, and found nothing. - MrX 03:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. This sounds really really interesting, but it absolutely does not belong on an encyclopedia. Perhaps Wikiversity might be a better venue? Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG. I can't find any reliable source coverage for this project or the group sponsoring it. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep -- I have found the link, via a link in the article. This appears to be a substantial on-going engineering project, of a kind of which there have only been a few worldwide. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.