Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N&k Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 03:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

N&k Technology

Article about a company written by User:Nktechnology. Are they notable. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Exterminate~~ Weak Keep with Eastmain's sources, it does help establish notability. The article still reads a bit like an ad, though, and may still be axed just for that. Red Zion^X 14:43, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as insufficiently notable per WP:CORP. — Satori Son 21:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I looked over the new links, but I still don't see enough to meet any of the various criteria at WP:CORP. Staying with "Delete" for now. — Satori Son 14:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some references (magazine articles). The journal articles published in Physical Review B which presumably relate to technologies used in this company's products tend to establish notability because research has to be quite good to be published there. Even though the article started out as a self-advertisement, I think the company is notable. --Eastmain (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:CORP and looks like somewhat of an advert. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 01:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Send to cleanup: The top half of the article is the only part we would want, and yet it is spectacularly uninformative. One assumes that such a manufacturer is important, as it's a particularly interesting and cutting edge industry, but the article is all about the director (something a stock investor might want to read) and not about the company. I.e. it looks like a press release with a Wikipedia article squatting on it. Utgard Loki (talk) 18:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails WP:CORP; the source cited are either the company's own press releases or are directories, and there are no reliable secondary sources in evidence here. I agree with Milk's Favorite Cookie that this article reads like an advertorial, and this may fail WP:SPAM as well. --Gavin Collins (talk) 16:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Gavin Collins (talk) 16:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:CORP. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The creator of the entry is "Nktechnology." Yeah, good try. TheAsianGURU (talk) 00:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.