Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as a keep following relist, nac SwisterTwister talk 03:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Myx[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverage of reliable sources. Passing mentions can be found but no in-depth coverage. — Za wl 09:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no indications of notability or significance; no SIGCOV. WP:PROMO also applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I find it unusual that the U.S. channel of the same name is notable owing to the existence of readily available online references, but the Philippine parent channel is "not notable" because of a lack of the same. Given that this is the only local music channel in the Philippines (and for a time, it was the only music channel overall until MTV reopened), it's hard to believe that the channel is not notable. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 03:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it generally passes WP:BROADCAST and being a notable music channel in the country (as I am from). Per Sky Harbor's comment. It is similarities with MTV and VH1. ApprenticeFan ^work 04:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Are there any sources in Filipino, Tagalog, or Spanish?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 09:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Even better, here are some sources in English: 1 2 3 4 5. And that's all from just one newspaper (of which a Google search shows 7,620 hits from that site alone when searching for Myx), which means that in the bigger scheme of things, I'd vote Keep. So with all due respect to the nominator, how well did you do your search before determining the article should be deleted? --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 01:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Easily meets WP:BROADCAST, especially with having a successful US counterpart. Also kind of troubling that the nominator didn't see out the first seven days of the nom and had a self-block of their account applied halfway through, thus I feel like this should be considered an abandoned nomination. Nate • (chatter) 00:17, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this is a notable music channel in the Philippines. I can't understand why the nominator nominated this for deletion in the first place. -WayKurat (talk) 11:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.