Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystique Magazine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Mystique Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:CORP, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline, or that the article can be usefuly expanded beyond this highly promotional unsourced stub. GNews hits are generally press releases or other PR material. Deprodded without explanation (and spammy content increased) by IP with only one other contribution. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this magazine. Joe Chill (talk) 22:39, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep Found some independent sources covering article along with providing original programming monthly to Pay Per View networks, and its states that the models featured are some of the same ones that have featured on national TV shows and publications. Heres one Article as is does need cleaned up through Calmer Waters 08:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The "coverage" cited by Calmer Waters is obvously just a press release by the magazine itself; here's a link to a properly identified version [1]. Such nonindependent PR isn't sufficient to establish notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete With that link provided would agree to delete as currently fails verifiability of facts from independent reliable sources. Calmer Waters 17:44, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.