Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystery Skulls

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, and thanks to Tokyogirl79 for adding to the article. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery Skulls[edit]

Mystery Skulls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. This band does not meet WP:N. Nearly all of the sources in the article are self-published sources by the band and those that are not do not even work. Recent popularity of a fan's music video does not equate to notability, particularly as the band still has no media presence to support notability. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I'm finding some evidence to show that the band is indeed notable: ([1], [2], [3], [4]) It looks like they were also the headliner at one party and played in various locations, but I'm not sure how much that will contribute. However I think that the question here should be whether or not this band/project should have its own article or be merged into the article for Luis Dubuc. So far I'm leaning towards a merge because there's not a huge amount on Dubuc's page and this could likely be easily condensed into his article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and redirect to Luis Dubuc for now, anyway. I think that we could maybe argue for an individual article, but at this point in time there's not a huge amount here that couldn't already be covered at Dubuc's article. When/if the act gains more coverage that would go beyond a few paragraphs, we can always un-redirect. I think that while we could argue for an individual article, that doesn't mean that this is the best option out there. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:22, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Just this week, the song "Ghost" by Mystery Skulls debuted at #17 on the Billboard US Hot Dance/Electronic Songs chart, ([5], [6]) which I think helps establish the band's notability since they have charted. I realize it may not fully establish it, but I think it helps to. Moonchïld9 (talk) 03:11, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changing vote to keep. It's good enough for me, Moonchïld9- I was actually just checking back in since coverage did seem to keep trickling in for them and I was hoping that there would be more. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:35, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: The animation associated with Mystery Skulls' "Ghost" has achieved considerable notoriety. This page could probably be expanded to be more useful, though I'll admit I'm not well-versed in Wikipedia bureaucracy. 181.160.107.127 (talk) 17:26, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.