Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myocardiodystrophy
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Cardiomyopathy. Sandstein 11:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Myocardiodystrophy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Myocardiodystrophy is not an accepted term in medical or scientific literature published in English. The references listed in this article, and almost all mentions of this term when searched in PubMed, are to publications in Russian or Ukrainian. I believe that the closest translation to the term in English is Cardiomyopathy. This page was until recently orphaned and only came to my attention when links to it were posted to a page I watch. An alternative to deletion could be changing it simply to a redirect to the Cardiomyopathy page. PeaBrainC (talk) 10:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 15:46, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- delete yep. or redirect to cardiomyopathy. Jytdog (talk) 00:08, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- redirect to Cardiomyopathy, refs in the article are 404 or offline, google showing it is a variation of cardiomyopathy. Szzuk (talk) 19:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.