Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myg0t (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Myg0t[edit]

Only relevance is covered at Half-Life 2#Source code leak already. Magazine coverage is limited to one esentence blurbs, most other sources are primary, unreliable or trivial. Also orphaned. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:25, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:40, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:ORG, WP:N, WP:V, and all the reasons it was deleted the first two times. A redirect to Half-Life_2#Source_code_leak might also make some sense. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 09:01, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All information here is likely to be original research with no notable references. Only really notable thing is, as said, the Half Life 2 Source code leak. Merge this information together. Otherwise delete per nom. Mattie ^TK 11:20, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Hardly anyone has heard about this site. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 23:22, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.