Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mycetic spore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge both. Daniel 03:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Mycetic spore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable fictional technology that lacks reliable sources to indicated any real-world notability, or context for this entry. While the Tyranids are notable, I'm not sure that every technological transportation device used by them is — and a search for sources that backs up real-world notability has come up empty. A prod template was deleted without comment, or any address of these concerns, by another user. I recommend merging this back to Tyranids, or transwiking it. Haemo 21:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm also nominating Arco-flagellation for all of the above reasons, with "Tyranids" replaced with whatever Imperial or Space Marine thingy this calls home. --Haemo 21:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions. -- --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 21:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - completely in-universe. Wikipedia isn't a gaming manual. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as has no real-world content or notability. --Gavin Collins 09:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Tyranids. Having the link doesn't hurt us, but I agree that it's not notable enough for a standalone article. -Harmil 18:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Merge any new (sourcable) content to the Tyranid article. Keeper | 76 21:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per WP:FICT. --W.marsh 22:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.