Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My type (dating)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Luna Santin 01:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dictdef, if that, unless I'm missing something. This phrase is no more than the sum of its parts.–♥ «Charles A. L.» 20:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - In my opinion, this doesn't even need to be merged into a dictionary project. As Charles points out, the definition follows directly from the definitions of the component words. -bobby 20:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no sources cited, and its a dicdef really. -- Whpq 21:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom and above discussion. Chris Kreider 15:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.