Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My World, My Way (video game)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My World, My Way (video game)[edit]
- My World, My Way (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Adam in MO Talk 08:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I would say speedily. ChildofMidnight (talk) 14:30, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BALL.Chasingsol (talk) 14:47, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not yet sufficient information available to support an article 0-Mgm|(talk) 15:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike (talk) 02:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with no prejudice against recreation if and when reliable sources cover this sufficiently to establish notability and verify the included facts. Wiw8 (talk) 17:14, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep AfD isn't cleap, this is why we have that "unreleased videogame" tag, etc. As it stands now, this is a game being published by a notable company with coverage in dozens of sites and magazines. The article sucks and is unsourced, but it isn't speculative and unsourcable. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 18:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, it is speculative. We are not a crystal ball in which to include articles based on rumors based on their own (i.e. primary) sources. Such future articles need secondary sources at the least. MuZemike (talk) 06:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Last time I checked Joystiq, gonintendo and etc weren't primary sources. On top of that, the game is already out. It's known in Japan as "Sekai wa Atashi de Mawatteru" or something. And please don't requote wikilinks at me and use the word "we" like you're in an exclusive club, that just grinds my gears. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 19:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If the article is sourceable, source it. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 20:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources from Joystiq are fine. Be bold and add them instead of being crass and uncivilly calling out other users, because that grinds my gears. MuZemike (talk) 03:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Last time I checked Joystiq, gonintendo and etc weren't primary sources. On top of that, the game is already out. It's known in Japan as "Sekai wa Atashi de Mawatteru" or something. And please don't requote wikilinks at me and use the word "we" like you're in an exclusive club, that just grinds my gears. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 19:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, it is speculative. We are not a crystal ball in which to include articles based on rumors based on their own (i.e. primary) sources. Such future articles need secondary sources at the least. MuZemike (talk) 06:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, by the way, per above. MuZemike (talk) 07:43, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.