Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Pal God Records

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jon Solomon. There is a consensus that the subject is not notable. There is also a consensus that the article should point at Jon Solomon, with multiple suggestions of a merge or redirect. There is no referenced content to merge so the effective result is a plain redirect. Any editor may find the unreferenced content in the history though, and may use it in the target article themselves. (non-admin closure)MarkH21talk 22:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My Pal God Records[edit]

My Pal God Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another unnotable record label. The article does not cite any sources, only the site of the label which is no support for notability. Couldn't find any decent sources, as the company is only present in the usual databases and WP mirrors. It seems like anything could've gotten a Wikipedia article back then, simply existing was enough, it seems. Thankfully, our standards have increased since then. This has been sitting here since 2007. Notability hasn't been proven ever since. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge / Redirect to Jon Solomon - there are sources found in a Google search and at Newspapers.com, but most simply mention the label in passing. The more substantial articles, such as this one found on Google or others found on Newspapers.com, tend to be about the founder of the record label. A merge / redirect to Jon Solomon would retain any useful content and point people to the label's founder. Alansohn (talk) 14:41, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree with nominator. Label fails WP:NOTE; at best, they seem tangentially connected to some of the bands listed on the page. Redoryxx (talk) 09:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Jon Solomon, with no prejudice to re-creation. WP:MUSIC's sense of an important label implies that this article should continue to exist. There are enough notable bands associated through this label that we should have some encyclopedic way to present that information, but I'm sort of neutral on whether that is done through a label article or an article on a label's founder. In any case, if additional sourcing or reasons of utility make it more feasible to have this as a separate article, this discussion should not hinder that process. Chubbles (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge / Redirect to Jon Solomon per those above.4meter4 (talk) 22:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.