Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Pony: Friendship Gardens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:35, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My Little Pony: Friendship Gardens

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game with a pretty much empty article. Ciaran Sinclair (talk) 09:59, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - SERIOUSLY, can you just stop putting these delete notices and fill up some details? It's not like everything to should be deleted in history.--Blackgaia02 (Talk if you're Worthy) (talk) 10:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think it's worth keeping, go find some reliable sources. Ciaran Sinclair (talk) 10:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing any third-party coverage or sourcing to establish notability. --DAJF (talk) 10:36, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Normally I would be for saving this, but a reliable sources search only turns up Allgame hits, which do little more than mention it existed. I couldn't find anything significant in regards to reviews or anything of the sort. I would suggest games like this be put into a List of My Little Pony video games article. --Teancum (talk) 16:58, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of reliable sources, which is odd since everyone's a brony now. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 12:59, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lack of third party coverage. Doesn't meet the WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 13:43, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.