Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Chemical Romance Fourth Album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My Chemical Romance Fourth Album[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER. Ironholds (talk) 02:16, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Was a contested PROD, which I simultaneously nominated for AfD. No name, no release date - WP:CRYSTAL -- Boing! said Zebedee 02:23, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per crystal CTJF83 chat 04:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The album appears to have been recorded, and there is coverage around ([1], [2], [3], [4]) but it is already covered much better in the band article and there's nothing worth keeping in this article. There isn't enough verifiable information for a separate article yet.--Michig (talk) 06:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hammer time (delete). --IllaZilla (talk) 07:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:CRYSTAL. Claritas (talk) 21:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The article has been moved to The Midnight Curfew by an editor citing this as a source for the album's title. However one look at the link shows that The Midnight Curfew is an upcoming documentary DVD about the band, not an album. The move should be undone so that this nomination can proceed without confusion. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like The Midnight Curfew has been rewritten to be about the upcoming DVD, so My Chemical Romance Fourth Album has effectively been deleted now. If the result of this discussion is Delete then I'd say all that needs to be done is to delete the redirect (unless there are any problems with article history that might need to be fixed?). If the result is Keep (which is starting to look unlikely) then the move and subsequent edits would need to be undone -- Boing! said Zebedee 08:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.