Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyNotex
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- MyNotex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No independent refs provided and a search fails to find any other than the usual software listing. Fails WP:GNG and is just one of very many similar applications . Velella Velella Talk 17:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Question: Did your search not turn up references such as [1] or [2] which are clearly reviews and not software listings? DeVerm (talk) 01:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: No notable sources. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 03:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Notability established by cited sources: [3], [4] ~Kvng (talk) 02:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Notability as per listed sources. I have fixed the referencing in the article and moved the manual to external links. DeVerm (talk) 14:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 09:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 09:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - The article does seem slightly promotional but the added references seem to be reliable reviews which, to me, satisfies WP:NSOFTWARE and WP:N. - Pmedema (talk) 16:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.