Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muzikbrowzer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. - Philippe | Talk 03:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muzikbrowzer

Does not appear to be WP:Notable; I can't find anything more than commercial blog mention of this software product. Was already deleted once via CSD as WP:Spam I believe (if my memory serves me); use of subheaders as marketing points in this re-creation seem to suggest as much.--Pgagnon999 (talk) 22:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The page you deleted yesterday was my first attempt at creating a wiki page. It was incomplete and I hadn't read enough before I had posted it. I later learned to use the sandbox or personal space for writing pages. So I did that, got the page up to muster (IMHO) and then reposted to the public space.

Now I have a question. I've read through all the wiki rules and guidelines. I see plainly that the rules state that wikipedia can't be used to create "advertising" pages and I respect and appreciate that. Yet, I see all sorts of wikipedia pages for commercial products. So I don't quite follow what the rules are versus what I see on wikipedia.

When does a commercial product become "notable" by wikipedia standards? When is it ok for a commercial product page to be on wikipedia? Is this spelled out somewhere, specifically? If not then I must object to deleting this page.

Thanks Mikem8 (talk) 03:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Mikem8[reply]

Comment Mike, have you carefully read WP:Spam, WP:Notability, and WP:Not? --Pgagnon999 (talk) 05:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable advert. Alberon (talk) 09:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there are no reliable sources to establish notability. Search results are primarliy download links. No articles to be found about the product. -- Whpq (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I understand. :Thanks Mikem8 (talk) 03:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Mikem8[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.