Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator after page improvements. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Muy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the entries on this page is really disambiguating "Muy". There are variations like de Muy, Le Muy, Félix du Muy, and Muy Muy, but it doesn't seem likely that these topics would be looked up solely by "Muy", and certainly aren't routinely known by the name "Muy" alone. The two May Rivers don't belong, nor do the three phrases in Spanish in the Other section that happen to begin with the Spanish word "muy". Finally, over half the entries on the page are red links anyway. It's at best a stretch. Largoplazo (talk) 02:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, while the page at the time it was nominated was a complete disaster, I've cleaned it up and found a couple of other entries. older ≠ wiser 13:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Now keep (though I'm a bit skeptical about the du Muy entry). Largoplazo (talk) 14:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Snow keep - great to see pages worked on after being AFD-ed so they can be kept and be useful. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.